THOUGHT: The user wants me to translate and “localize” the Turkish phrase “Asagidaki Başlığı İngilizce çevir ve özgünleştir” to English, which means “Translate and localize the following title to English”. The user then provides an English title: “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies”. The user’s instructions are: 1. Translate and localize the given title. 2. Provide *only one* localized title. 3. Remove any special characters from the original title (though “Hershey’s” has an apostrophe, the instruction “özel karakterler varsa sil ve özel karakter ekleme * gibi” could imply removing it, but “Hershey’s” is a brand name and the apostrophe is part of it. I should aim for a natural, marketable title, so keeping the apostrophe for the brand is probably fine unless the user explicitly wants *all* non-alphanumeric characters removed. Given the example “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies”, there are no special characters like * or #. The apostrophe in Hershey’s is part of the brand name and usually kept. I’ll assume “special characters” refers to things like asterisks, emojis, etc., not standard punctuation within a brand name or a possessive that is grammatically correct and common in titles). 4. Do not add special characters (like *). 5. Do not include introductory phrases like “İşte özgün başlık:”. 6. Just write the title. The title “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” is already in English and sounds perfectly fine as a product name or recipe title. “Özgünleştir” means “localize” or “make original/unique”. In this context, it probably means to make it sound more appealing or slightly different if there’s a common way to phrase such a title, or perhaps to shorten it if it’s too long, while keeping the core meaning. Let’s break down the current title: – “Hershey’s Gold”: This specifies the type of Hershey’s product used, likely a specific chocolate or candy bar flavor. It’s a key identifier. – “Peanut Butter”: This is a primary flavor component. – “Oatmeal Cookies”: This describes the base cookie type. The title is already quite descriptive and concise for what it describes. “Localizing” it might mean making it punchier or more direct if there’s a common idiom or style for cookie titles. Possible slight variations/interpretations for “özgünleştir”: 1. **Keep it as is:** It’s already good. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. “Özgünleştir” might just mean to make sure it’s “original” in English, which it is. 2. **Slight rephrasing for flow/impact:** * Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter & Oatmeal Cookies (adding ‘&’ for a slight stylistic change) * Oatmeal Cookies with Hershey’s Gold & Peanut Butter (rearranging, but less direct) * Golden Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies (if “Gold” refers to the color/richness rather than a specific Hershey’s product, but it clearly refers to “Hershey’s Gold”). This changes the meaning. * Hershey’s Gold-Infused Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies (too long, sounds like a recipe description) * Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies with Hershey’s Gold (rearrangement, slightly longer) The original title “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” is very common and effective for a recipe or product. It clearly lists the key ingredients and the type of cookie. If “özgünleştir” implies making it more “marketable” or “snappy”, one might consider if any part is redundant or could be combined. But “Hershey’s Gold”, “Peanut Butter”, and “Oatmeal Cookies” are all essential descriptors. Consider the user’s explicit instruction: “özel karakterler varsa sil ve özel karakter ekleme * gibi”. The apostrophe in “Hershey’s” is a possessive and part of the brand name. Removing it would make it “Hersheys Gold”, which is incorrect for the brand. Usually, when “special characters” are mentioned, it refers to non-alphanumeric symbols that aren’t standard punctuation for grammar or brand names (like “!”, “@”, “#”, “$”, “%”, “^”, “&”, “*”, “(“, “)”, “_”, “+”, “=”, “[“, “]”, “{“, “}”, “|”, “\\”, “;”, “:”, “‘”, “\””, “<", ">“, “,”, “.”, “?”, “/”). An apostrophe for possession (Hershey’s product) or contraction (don’t) is typically considered standard punctuation. Given the context of a brand name, it’s almost certainly meant to be kept. If the user *really* wanted all punctuation removed, they would typically specify “alphanumeric only”. Let’s assume the “özgünleştir” part means to just ensure it’s a naturally flowing, marketable English title. Since the given title is already excellent for that purpose, I might just return the same title or a very minor stylistic change if I can justify it. If I *must* change it to “localize/make it unique” while keeping the meaning, a very subtle change could be: “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter & Oatmeal Cookies” (adding ‘&’ instead of implied ‘and’). This is a common stylistic choice in titles. However, the original “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” is already very natural and direct. Often, “localize” just means to ensure the existing phrasing works well in the target language, and for this, it does. Let me think if there’s any ambiguity in “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies”. It means oatmeal cookies that contain Hershey’s Gold (a specific product) AND peanut butter. It’s clear. What if “özgünleştir” means to make it slightly more compact or catchy? “Golden Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” -> This would imply “gold” is a descriptor for the cookies themselves (e.g., color) and *not* a specific Hershey’s product, changing the meaning. So, no. “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oat Cookies” -> Shortens “Oatmeal” to “Oat”, but “Oatmeal Cookies” is the standard term. What if “özgünleştir” means to make it sound more appetising? “Decadent Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” (too long, adds new words) Given the strict instructions “sadece 1 adet özgün başlığı ver”, “özel karakterler varsa sil ve özel karakter ekleme * gibi”, “işte özgün başlık: gibi cümleler kurmadan, sadece başlığı yaz”, I should be very conservative. The most faithful and “localized” (in the sense of being perfectly natural English) version of “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” is… “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies”. If I *have* to make it “unique” or “localized” in a way that implies a change, the safest option is a stylistic one that doesn’t alter meaning, like using an ampersand. “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter & Oatmeal Cookies” This removes the implied “and” between “Peanut Butter” and “Oatmeal” and explicitly states a connection often done with an ampersand in titles. It’s a minor stylistic change that makes it “unique” compared to the literal string provided, while still being perfectly natural and common in English titles. Let’s re-evaluate the “özel karakterler varsa sil” (if there are special characters, delete them). An apostrophe is a special character. If I strictly follow this, “Hershey’s” would become “Hersheys”. “Hersheys Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” This would be grammatically incorrect for the brand name. However, the user also says “özel karakter ekleme * gibi” (do not add special characters * like). This implies symbols like asterisks. Standard punctuation like apostrophes in brand names are usually exempt from “special character” removal unless explicitly stated (e.g., “alphanumeric only”). If I remove the apostrophe, it becomes less “özgün” (original/correct) as a brand name. Let’s assume the user means “extraneous” special characters or symbols not part of standard English grammar or brand spelling. The apostrophe in “Hershey’s” is part of the brand. If I were to give the *most* “özgünleştirilmiş” (localized/unique/rephrased) version *without* changing the core meaning and adhering to no “new” special characters *like asterisks*, and assuming the apostrophe in Hershey’s is part of its identity and not considered an “extraneous special character”: The provided title is already a strong, natural English title. “Localizing” it might just mean confirming it’s good as is. What if “özgünleştir” means to make it shorter/punchier? “Hershey’s Gold PB Oatmeal Cookies” (PB is common but might lose some formality) “Golden Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” (changes meaning, “Gold” as an adjective vs. a product) I will stick to the interpretation that “özgünleştir” means to make it sound good and natural in English, which the original already does very well. If I *have* to make a change to demonstrate “localization/uniqueness”, I’ll make a minimal stylistic one. “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” is perfect as is. If I am forced to change it, maybe: “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter & Oat Cookies” (shortens oatmeal slightly, adds ampersand, minimal change) – but “Oatmeal Cookies” is standard. Let’s reconsider the “özel karakterler varsa sil” instruction. If I have to be extremely literal about “special characters”, then ‘ becomes an issue. However, in practical translation/localization, brand names are usually treated as fixed. If the goal is purely about characters: “Hersheys Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies”. This looks wrong. The user’s examples of special characters are “*”. This usually refers to symbols that are not standard text punctuation. An apostrophe is standard text punctuation. Given the goal is to “çevir ve özgünleştir” (translate and localize), a localized title should be grammatically correct and marketable in English. Removing the apostrophe from “Hershey’s” would violate this for the brand name. Therefore, I will treat “Hershey’s” as a fixed entity. What’s a minor change that makes it “özgün” (unique/localized) yet still perfect? Sometimes adding an article or a slightly different word order. But the current one is very direct. “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” – This is my primary choice. It’s already localized. If the user specifically wants *some* change, I might try to add a word that subtly enhances it without altering meaning or length too much. But the instruction implies “localization” rather than “adding new descriptive words”. Let’s go with the most straightforward interpretation: The title is already in English, and it is a perfectly “localized” and “original” (in the sense of being a valid, unique title) English title. So, the best translation and localization might be to return it as is, demonstrating that it’s already ideal. If I *must* make it slightly different for the sake of “özgünleştir”, the ‘&’ change is the safest. “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter & Oatmeal Cookies” Let me consider if there’s any other common phrasing. “Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies with Hershey’s Gold” – this changes the order, and potentially the emphasis. The original is concise and puts “Hershey’s Gold” first, indicating it’s a key feature. Let’s stick to the principle of “if it’s not broken, don’t fix it” for localization unless there’s a clear improvement or a common alternative phrasing. The phrase “Hershey’s Gold Peanut Butter Oatmeal Cookies” is already a clear, descriptive, and well-formed title for a recipe or product. It needs no “localization” in the sense of making it more “English”, as it already is. “Özgünleştir” in this context might just mean “ensure it is a good, original English title”. I will provide the title as is. It fulfills all criteria: – It’s in English. – It’s “özgün” (original/unique) in its good formulation. – No special characters are added (and the apostrophe in Hershey’s is part of the brand name, not an “added special character” or an “extraneous special character to be removed”). – It’s a single title. – No introductory phrases. If the user *expected* a change, they should have provided a title that needed more work, or specified *how* to make it unique (e.g., “make it shorter”, “add an adjective”). Since they provided an already excellent English title, the best “localization” is to present it as perfect.